Legislative Public Meetings

File #: 22-0991   
Type: Report to Council Status: Presented for Adoption
Meeting Body: City Council
On agenda: 11/1/2022
Title: Introduce an Ordinance to Amend, Approve, and Adopt a Revised Public Safety Military Equipment Use Policy Pursuant to California Assembly Bill No. 481, to Increase the Authorized Quantity of Unmanned Aerial Systems, Commonly Referred to as Drones, from Two to Three Devices
Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance, 2. UAS Drone Activity Log, 3. UAS Drone Program Website Link
REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Title
Introduce an Ordinance to Amend, Approve, and Adopt a Revised Public Safety Military Equipment Use Policy Pursuant to California Assembly Bill No. 481, to Increase the Authorized Quantity of Unmanned Aerial Systems, Commonly Referred to as Drones, from Two to Three Devices

Report
BACKGROUND
On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law California Assembly Bill No. 481 (AB 481), relating to the acquisition and use of military equipment by law enforcement agencies. AB 481 requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval from the agency's governing body, in the form of an ordinance adopting a publicly released policy, prior to funding, acquiring or using any military equipment. The term "military equipment" is broadly defined in the new law (California Government Code section 7070) and includes various pieces of equipment that are currently used by the Department of Public Safety (DPS) staff such as drones, the command vehicle, battering rams, tear gas, pepper balls, armored personnel carrier, and flash bangs. DPS does not possess any equipment acquired from military surplus programs (known as 1033 Programs) designed for military use.

AB 481 required all law enforcement agencies to develop a military use policy approved by its governing body by ordinance by May 1, 2022. At minimum, AB 481 required that the approved policy address the type, quantity, capabilities, purposes, and authorized uses of each type of military equipment; the cost associated with its acquisition and continued use; the legal limitations and procedural rules that govern its use; the training required; the mechanisms in place to ensure policy compliance; and the procedures by which members of the public may file complaints. The City Council was also required to make findings that the equipment was necessary, will safeguard the public's safety, is reasonably cost effective, and that prior uses complied with policy.

In compliance with AB 48...

Click here for full text