Legislative Public Meetings

File #: 16-0306   
Type: Report to Council Status: Passed
Meeting Body: City Council
On agenda: 3/29/2016
Title: Third Amendment to Outside Counsel Agreement with Rankin Stock Heaberlin for Litigation Services (Continued from March 15, 2016)
Attachments: 1. Draft Third Amendment to Outside Counsel Agreement
REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Title
Third Amendment to Outside Counsel Agreement with Rankin Stock Heaberlin for Litigation Services (Continued from March 15, 2016)

Report
REPORT IN BRIEF
Approval is requested for a Third Amendment to the Outside Counsel Agreement with the law firm of Rankin Stock Heaberlin for legal services and representation of the City in the matter of Gorla v. City of Sunnyvale, Case No. 114CV262389, currently pending in the Santa Clara County Superior Court. This Third Amendment is needed to cover the costs associated with proceeding to trial on this case, which are estimated to be between $75,000 to $100,000.

BACKGROUND
David J. Stock, a partner in the law firm Rankin Stock Heaberlin in San Jose, is a trial lawyer specializing in construction law, civil litigation, business law, personal injury, estate litigation, insurance coverage and defense, mediation, and arbitration. Mr. Stock and his firm were retained by the City Attorney under Section 908 of the City Charter to represent the City and provide legal services, consultation and advice concerning the above referenced case in litigation. The Agreement was entered in March 2014, and the not to exceed amount has been increased twice to the current not to exceed amount of $150,000. The term of the Agreement expires in December 2018.

DISCUSSION
The Rankin law firm has represented the City in many personal injury cases during the past years. This current case involves a wrongful death/dangerous condition lawsuit against the City. It is anticipated that the City may incur an additional $75,000 to $100,000 in legal fees for this case assuming it goes to trial without settling. Therefore, it is necessary to amend the Agreement to allow for an additional $100,000 in potential legal expenses, for a new not-to-exceed amount of $250,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a "project" with the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (...

Click here for full text