Legislative Public Meetings

File #: 18-0683   
Type: Report to Council Status: Passed
Meeting Body: City Council
On agenda: 8/14/2018
Title: Third Amendment to Outside Counsel Agreement with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore for Litigation Services
Attachments: 1. Draft Third Amendment to Agreement
REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Title
Third Amendment to Outside Counsel Agreement with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore for Litigation Services

Report
REPORT IN BRIEF
Approval is requested for a Third Amendment to the Outside Counsel Agreement with the law firm of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore for legal services and representation of the City in the matter of Castro, Juan v. City of Sunnyvale, Case No. 17-CV-309241, currently pending in the Santa Clara County Superior Court. This Third Amendment is needed to cover the pre-trial costs associated with this case, which is estimated to be $155,000.

BACKGROUND
Suzanne Solomon, a partner in the law firm Liebert Cassidy Whitmore in San Francisco, is an experienced trial lawyer who has represented public entities, private companies and individuals in a wide range of employment disputes. Ms. Solomon and her firm were retained by the City Attorney under Section 908 of the City Charter to represent the City and provide legal services, consultation and advice concerning the above referenced case in litigation. The Agreement was entered in May 2017, and the not to exceed amount has been increased twice to the current not to exceed amount of $150,000. The term of the Agreement expires in May 2020.

DISCUSSION
Plaintiff filed a race discrimination lawsuit against the City on April 3, 2017.

The City has been vigorously defending the case and a motion for summary judgment is pending. This amendment, which will increase the not-to-exceed amount by $155,000 for a total new not-to-exceed amount of $305,000, will cover the balance of costs for the summary judgment motion and, if it is not granted, anticipated pre-trial costs, including remaining depositions and case management.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a "project" with the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) in that it is a fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to ...

Click here for full text