presentation on submitting one Priority Project Idea to the City Council. They stated
that the Council approved the new Council Priority Projects Process Policy 7.3.26,
which establishes a more structured method for identifying, prioritizing, and
implementing new Council Priority Projects. This policy replaces the former Study
Issues Process. The Council also modified Policy 7.2.19 regarding Board and
Commission input. They reviewed the timeline for the new Council Priority Projects
Process and clarified that each Board and Commission may, by majority vote,
advance only one idea for Council consideration. They further clarified that Boards
and Commissions will no longer submit a form, nor will staff prepare a staff
recommendation. They confirmed that consultants analyzed the former Study Issues
Process and found that, although many Study Issues were submitted, very few were
ultimately adopted. As a result, the process consumed significant staff and
Commission time. To streamline the approach and use resources more effectively,
the new process was determined to be the most strategic solution.
They noted that participation by Boards and Commissions is optional. If the
Commission chooses to participate, discussion would take place in November, with
this year's deadline extended to December. They also reviewed the format of the
discussion and walked through the information posted on the City’s website. They
encouraged Commissioners to attend the Council Priority Projects Workshop in
February, during which the Council identifies proposals that move forward for staff
analysis. Commissioners were reminded that they may attend as members of the
public to advocate for an idea. They also reviewed the email sent by City Manager,
Tim Kirby to all Board and Commission members. Finally, they reminded the
Commission of the two Study Issues that had previously received a majority vote
before the Study Issues Process was replaced.
The Commission took a recess at 8:25 p.m. and resumed at 8:32 p.m. with all
Commissioners present.
EAI Manager Perdomo Arciniegas noted that, because two ideas have already
received a majority vote, the Commission could review those ideas and hold a
discussion that also allows additional ideas to be presented. To give
Commissioners time to consider any new proposals, they suggested placing this
item on the agenda again in December.
Chair Zapata asked for clarification regarding whether Commissioners could submit
ideas by email and have those ideas added to a list. Staff explained that the
previous process involved maintaining a list; however, under the new process, staff
will no longer create or add items to such a list. New ideas will instead be
introduced and discussed during the Commission meeting.