AMENDMENTS  
					Location: Moffett Park Specific Plan Area (APNs: Various)  
					File #: 2022-7673  
					Zoning: Various  
					Environmental Review: A Draft Environmental Impact Report  
					(DEIR) has been prepared to evaluate the proposed project in  
					accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental  
					Quality Act (CEQA).  
					Project Planner: Michelle King, (408) 730-7463,  
					
					Director of Community Development Trudi Ryan provided the staff report and  
					answered questions from commissioners.  
					Also available to answer questions from Commissioners; Planning Officer Shaunn  
					Mendrin, Principal Planner Michelle King, Associate Planner Kelly Cha, Rami and  
					Associates Senior Associate Chris Sensenig and Principal Eric Yurkovich.  
					After some clarifying questions, Chair Stetson opened the public hearing at 10:12  
					p.m.  
					Kenneth Javier Rosales spoke on behalf of SV@HOME. Mr. Rosales thanked staff  
					for all the work that has been done to move this project forward. He also expressed  
					concern over being overly dependent on the inclusionary housing program to meet  
					Sunnyvale's affordable housing needs and goals. He encouraged incentivizing  
					more affordable housing development to reach Sunnyvale's goals, he suggested  
					that there was an opportunity to create an explicit requirement to build at minimum  
					15% of residential units to be income-restricted to low, very-low and extremely-low  
					income households, along with a 20% goal. He also suggested that there needs to  
					be clarification of how much affordable housing is valued compared to other  
					community benefits. Lastly, he shared that he sent a letter to the commissioners  
					regarding how to use housing mitigation fees generated by the Moffett project, and  
					suggesting to reduce development fees for affordable housing within the Plan area.  
					Ray Hashimoto of HMH Engineers on behalf of Miramar Capital, property owners of  
					352 E Java Drive. Mr. Hashimoto thanked staff and consultants for their work on  
					developing the Specific Plan. He spoke in opposition of the proposed diagonal  
					design. He shared that the design bisects and complicates/prevents the  
					development of the property. He suggested a version of the design where the  
					perimeters of properties are built into the plan. He objected to the additional 9 to 19  
					ft requirements for transportation and suggested use of the available landscaping  
					area to offset this requirement. He noted that the bicycle and pedestrian features  
					should provide a good network to travel within the area without the diagonal  
					feature. He also asked for language to be changed to provide more flexibility for  
					coordination between properties for a more cohesive lane way design. Lastly, he