City of Sunnyvale  
Meeting Minutes  
Planning Commission  
Monday, February 10, 2025  
7:00 PM  
Online and Council Chambers, City Hall,  
456 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086  
No Study Session | Public Hearing - 7:00 PM  
NO STUDY SESSION  
7 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING  
CALL TO ORDER  
Chair Iglesias called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.  
SALUTE TO THE FLAG  
Chair Iglesias led the salute to the flag.  
ROLL CALL  
Present: 7 -  
Chair Nathan Iglesias  
Vice Chair Galen Kim Davis  
Commissioner Chris Figone  
Commissioner Martin Pyne  
Commissioner Michael Serrone  
Commissioner Neela Shukla  
Commissioner Ilan Sigura  
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS  
None.  
CONSENT CALENDAR  
There were no public speakers for this agenda item.  
MOTION: Commissioner Pyne moved and Vice Chair Davis seconded the motion to  
approve the Consent Calendar.  
The motion carried by the following vote:  
Yes: 7 -  
Chair Iglesias  
Vice Chair Davis  
Commissioner Figone  
Commissioner Pyne  
Commissioner Serrone  
Commissioner Shukla  
Commissioner Sigura  
No: 0  
This decision, as it applies to Agenda Item 1.B, is final unless appealed or called up  
for review by the City Council by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, February 25, 2025.  
Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 27, 2025  
1.A  
Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 27, 2025 as submitted.  
Proposed Project:  
Related applications on a 0.14-acre site:  
1.B  
DESIGN REVIEW: To allow construction of a 398 square-foot  
first story addition and 760 square-foot second story addition to  
an existing one-story single-family home, on a 6,215.62  
square-foot lot, resulting in a single-family home of 2,952 square  
feet and 47.5% Floor Area Ratio (FAR).  
Location: 721 Harvard Ave (APN: 201-10-001)  
File #: PLNG-2024-0361  
Zoning: R-0 (Low Density Residential)  
Applicant / Owner: Walter Chapman (applicant) / Mark and Briana  
Tabry (owners)  
Environmental Review: A Class 1 Categorical Exemption relieves this  
project from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provisions.  
Project Planner: Julia Klein, (408) 730-7463, jklein@sunnyvale.ca.gov  
PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS  
Consider Potential Modifications to Relocation Assistance  
2.  
Requirements for Sunnyvale Municipal Code Chapter 19.71 Residential  
Tenant Protections Programs and Provide Direction to Staff  
Affordable Housing Manager Ernie Defrenchi presented the staff report with an oral  
presentation.  
Commissioner Serrone asked how many no fault, just cause evictions the City has  
in a typical year. Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi answered that while the  
City does not receive this data, the City has received 20 or fewer calls within the  
last few years from evicted tenants or property managers ensuring their compliance  
with applicable regulations.  
Commissioner Serrone confirmed with Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi that  
in a no fault, just cause eviction due to unit remodeling, the City requires relocation  
assistance of two months of rent. However, landlords may also consider offering  
their tenants temporary housing in another available unit to minimize these costs.  
Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi elaborated on the added protections offered  
by Senate Bill 567.  
Commissioner Serrone and Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi discussed the  
applicable tenant protections in instances where a deed restriction for an affordable  
housing unit expires.  
Commissioner Serrone commented that the target audience for the October  
outreach meetings may not have been able to attend for various reasons.  
At Vice Chair Davis’ request, Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi explained how  
information on tenant protections is transmitted to both property owners and renters.  
Vice Chair Davis confirmed with Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi that there  
are no enforcement policies or penalties for landlords who fail to provide the  
required relocation assistance to their tenants. However, tenants may file a lawsuit  
against their landlords in small claims court and cite the City’s ordinance if they are  
not provided the relocation assistance they are entitled to.  
Commissioner Pyne inquired about the outcome for tenants who were subject to a  
no fault, just cause eviction and were referred to Project Sentinel by the City.  
Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi answered that the City receives few details  
on the outcome of these cases. He added that survey respondents thought that an  
additional month of relocation assistance would be beneficial.  
Commissioner Shukla and Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi discussed  
additional funds that a tenant is allotted to in the event of a no fault, just cause  
eviction. This includes first and last month’s rent and security deposit (if unspent  
and applicable).  
Chair Iglesias confirmed with Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi that sole  
proprietors of single-family homes are exempt from providing relocation assistance.  
Chair Iglesias confirmed with Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi that at the end  
of the initial twelve-month lease, property owners may choose not to renew their  
tenants’ lease, and this would not be considered an eviction.  
Chair Iglesias opened the Public Hearing.  
Susan Selna noted that Project Sentinel has additional information on the outcome  
of tenants subject to a no fault, just cause eviction. Affordable Housing Manager  
Defrenchi responded that the data provided by Project Sentinel on a quarterly basis  
includes information related to tenant-landlord mediation and is not individualized.  
Chair Iglesias closed the Public Hearing.  
Commissioner Serrone and Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi discussed the  
similarities and differences between the City ordinance and state law regarding  
relocation assistance.  
Commissioner Pyne shared an anecdote about how he learned who the property  
owner of his rental unit is.  
MOTION: Commissioner Shukla moved and Commissioner Sigura seconded the  
motion to recommend Alternative 1 to the City Council:  
Do not modify Sunnyvale Municipal Code (SMC) Chapter 19.71: Residential Tenant  
Protections Programs, and keep relocation assistance for no fault, just cause  
evictions at two months of rent.  
Commissioner Shukla spoke in favor of the motion and explained why. She also  
spoke of ways to better educate tenants on their rights.  
Commissioner Serrone voiced his support of the motion and stated why.  
Commissioner Pyne expressed that while he will vote in favor of the motion, it would  
be helpful to receive additional information to discern whether an additional month  
of relocation assistance is better. He added that the report to City Council would  
benefit from the inclusion of data on the relocation assistance required by  
neighboring cities.  
Vice Chair Davis spoke in agreement with comments made by Commissioner Pyne.  
He added that adjustments may be made to the City’s policy on relocation  
assistance for tenants after additional data is available.  
Commissioner Serrone agreed that the policy should remain unchanged for now. He  
also asked whether a landlord may increase rent after evicting a tenant to renovate  
a rental property. Affordable Housing Manager Defrenchi answered that if the new  
law does not require first right of refusal at the same rent price, the landlord may  
increase rent.  
Chair Iglesias spoke in overall support of the motion.  
The motion carried by the following vote:  
Yes: 7 -  
Chair Iglesias  
Vice Chair Davis  
Commissioner Figone  
Commissioner Pyne  
Commissioner Serrone  
Commissioner Shukla  
Commissioner Sigura  
No: 0  
This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the  
February 25, 2025 meeting.  
Recommend to City Council:  
3.  
Proposed Project: Introduce an Ordinance to:  
Amend Title 19 (Zoning) of the Sunnyvale Municipal Code related to  
recent State Legislation on Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).  
File #: PLNG-2024-0544  
Environmental Review: The action is exempt pursuant to Public  
Resources Code Section 21080.17 and California Environmental Quality  
Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and 15268.  
Project Planner: Aastha Vashist, (408) 730-7458,  
Senior Planner Aastha Vashist presented the staff report with a slide presentation.  
Commissioner Pyne asked about how the City’s tree provisions will apply to  
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) created pursuant to Government Code section  
66323. Senior Planner Vashist responded that while tree provisions serve as a  
standard condition of approval for ADUs, staff may consult with the California  
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to verify. She also  
explained that HCD will only review the City’s proposed ordinance upon its adoption  
by City Council. Senior Assistant City Attorney Sandra Lee added that staff may  
consult with HCD to determine whether the City’s tree replacement standards are  
considered a development or design standard or a standard condition of approval.  
Principal Planner George Schroeder also provided context for the inclusion of tree  
replacement provisions in the proposed ordinance.  
Commissioner Pyne noted that Government Code section 66323 (b) does not  
appear to limit the City’s ability to impose standards on local heritage resources.  
Commissioner Serrone commented that, in his opinion, ADUs alone will not make a  
meaningful impact on our affordable housing crisis, but they allow property owners  
to make improvements on their property.  
Commissioner Serrone, regarding Assembly Bill 2533, asked who determines  
whether unpermitted ADUs constructed before January 1, 2020 pose a threat to the  
health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure. Senior Planner Aastha  
Vashist explained that California Health and Safety Code section 17920.3 defines a  
substandard building and that local agencies must cite which substandard  
conditions would result in denial of an application for these unpermitted ADUs.  
Commissioner Serrone confirmed with Principal Planner Schroeder that property  
owners decide whether their ADUs will share a power source or water and sewer  
lines with the main house.  
Commissioner Serrone shared that, in his opinion, it is unworkable to have separate  
owners for the ADU and the main house.  
Commissioner Sigura shared his knowledge of ADUs and the requirements they are  
subject to.  
Commissioner Sigura confirmed with Senior Planner Aastha Vashist that while  
streamlined ADUs are not subject to the City’s design requirements, they must still  
comply with fire and building codes.  
Commissioner Sigura confirmed with Senior Planner Aastha Vashist that the  
proposed ordinance permits up to three ADUs – detached, conversion, and junior  
ADUs.  
Commissioner Sigura proposed that the City follow a process to legalize ADUs and  
ensure that they undergo an inspection to comply with applicable codes. Senior  
Planner Aastha Vashist answered that Assembly Bill 2533 addresses the standards  
that ADUs are subject to and that homeowners may obtain a confidential third party  
code inspection to conform to those standards.  
At Vice Chair Davis’ request, Senior Planner Vashist explained how the square  
footage requirements for ADUs and JADUs were derived.  
Vice Chair Davis and Senior Planner Vashist discussed the applicable requirements  
for both streamlined and non-streamlined ADUs. He also confirmed with Senior  
Planner Vashist that ADUs exceeding 800 square feet are ministerial and would not  
require Planning Commission review.  
Commissioner Figone and Senior Planner Vashist discussed tree removal  
provisions where proposed ADUs are concerned. They also discussed the number  
of ADUs permitted for single- and multi-family homes.  
Commissioner Figone asked whether ADUs are subject to Americans with Disability  
Act (ADA) accessibility requirements. Senior Planner Vashist responded that  
additional research is required to determine whether ADUs are subject to  
ADA-accessibility requirements.  
Commissioner Figone confirmed with Senior Planner Vashist that, for ADUs built  
atop a garage, only the square footage of the living space is considered and not  
that of the garage.  
Commissioner Shukla shared her knowledge and background regarding Heritage  
trees and tree provisions that apply to ADUs. She also confirmed with Senior  
Planner Vashist that the City of San Jose is the only city within the state which  
permits the separate sale of ADUs.  
At Commissioner Shukla’s request, Senior Planner Vashist elaborated on the  
parking requirements and front, side, and rear setback requirements for streamlined  
and non-streamlined ADUs.  
Chair Iglesias offered some thoughts on the complexities of the ADU permitting  
process.  
Chair Iglesias opened the Public Hearing.  
There were no public speakers for this agenda item.  
Chair Iglesias closed the Public Hearing.  
MOTION: Commissioner Sigura moved and Commissioner Shukla seconded the  
motion to recommend Alternative 1 to the City Council:  
Introduce the Ordinance (Attachment 2) Amending Title 19 (Zoning) of the  
Sunnyvale Municipal Code on Accessory Dwelling Units and find that this action is  
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public  
Resources Codes Sections 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3)  
and 15268.  
Commissioner Sigura spoke in support of the motion since it will allow for the  
creation of more affordable housing opportunities within the City.  
Commissioner Shukla voiced her support of the motion and explained the benefits of  
ADUs in the City.  
Commissioner Figone stated that while he is in support of the motion, he has  
reservations about it.  
Vice Chair Davis expressed his support of the motion, commended staff for  
streamlining the proposed ordinance, and spoke of the benefits that ADUs offer.  
Chair Iglesias confirmed his support of the motion and elaborated on his own  
personal experience with owner-occupied ADUs.  
The motion carried by the following vote:  
Yes: 7 -  
Chair Iglesias  
Vice Chair Davis  
Commissioner Figone  
Commissioner Pyne  
Commissioner Serrone  
Commissioner Shukla  
Commissioner Sigura  
No: 0  
This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the  
March 25, 2025 meeting.  
STANDING ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL STUDY ISSUES  
None.  
INFORMATION ONLY REPORTS/ITEMS  
None.  
Planning Commission Proposed Study Issues, Calendar Year: 2026  
(Information Only)  
4.  
NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND COMMENTS  
-Commissioner Comments  
Vice Chair Davis inquired about the upcoming Planning Commissioners Academy.  
-Staff Comments  
None.  
ADJOURNMENT  
Chair Iglesias adjourned the meeting at 8:43 PM.